Answer:
1. No, It is not a good example of writing a reaction paper because it is only composed with pure feelings and own opinions that are not backed by proper resources. The text or the paper itself doesn't really include proper criticism.
2. The paper should include a short summary of the work, but the main focus is your thoughts, feelings and rationalizations about what's discussed in the original text. It requires analysis of the given work on your part, followed by a focused, well-thought-out reaction backed by outside sources, where applicable.
Explanation:
I don't really know if my answer satisfied you :>> I hope this helps! :]