Answer:
1. Is the main character relatable to you? (Cite some qualities that make you similar or different.)
The main character, the older brother is not exactly relatable to myself, however, as he shows concern and love for his own brother, I am too. He takes care of his brother not only presently but for the future. Compared to myself, I am like this also since I do have siblings and I have to think about their well-being.
2. Is the setting effective or useful making you visualize the scenes? (Cite some lines that appeal to your senses)
Not exactly because the settings are from ancient years and it is quite hard to imagine the scenarios with words that are quite obsolete. However, the lines that goes like: So that night the younger brother went to his silo, gathered a large bundle of wheat, and climbed the hill that separated the two farms and over to his brother’s farm. Leaving the wheat in his brother’s silo, the younger brother returned home, feeling pleased with himself. So in this case, it is easy to reimagine it.
3. Is the plot interesting? (Cite aspects of it that make it good or dull.)
The plot provides a moral story about family however, as a story, it is rather tedious. There is no actual plot, the plot is not interesting there is no challenge. It isn’t even an interesting anecdote.
4. Is the conflict clear and realistic? (Indicate if it is something that people are likely to experience in life.)
Actually, the conflict is not qualified as a conflict. In fact, conflict does not seem to appear in the story. Also, it is not realistic. Though, the familial values are realistic, the plot and supposed conflict is not.
5. Is the theme relevant to human experiences? (Instead of an explanation, write the theme you inferred from each story.)
Yes, it is indeed relevant to human experiences. Families look out after each other.
#BrainlyFast
https://brainly.ph/question/9304380